Pilot a controlled AI workflow before it goes live
Corentis Shield helps teams test checkpoints, human review, escalation and evidence capture around AI-assisted regulated workflows.
Who this is for
Corentis is seeking focused conversations with regulated teams who want a low-friction way to test AI-assisted work before production deployment.
Ideal first pilot
What a design partner pilot could test
The pilot can start in a non-production setting, using realistic scenarios to learn where checkpointing, review and evidence are needed.
Suggested pilot stages
Stage 1
Select workflow
Stage 2
Define boundaries
Stage 3
Map policy controls
Stage 4
Run scenario tests
Stage 5
Simulate runtime checkpoints
Stage 6
Review blocked/escalated actions
Stage 7
Generate evidence pack
Stage 8
Decide next step
The checkpoint pattern
AI proposes
Draft reply, recommendation, case update or workflow action.
Corentis checks
Policy, risk, context, approval and evidence requirements.
Decision returned
Proceed, review, escalate or block before action.
Human review
Sensitive or uncertain cases go to the right person.
Evidence logged
Proposal, reason, decision, reviewer and timestamp recorded.
What the design partner receives
A design partner pilot can begin as non-production exploration. Corentis does not claim regulatory approval or live enterprise deployment.
Preview the evidence shape
Sample report structure
What a pilot report contains
Use-case boundary
Control objectives
Scenario tests
Checkpoint outcomes
Review queue summary
Evidence log
Residual risks
Go/no-go recommendation
Control matrix preview
Policy intent turned into reviewable controls
Vulnerable customer disclosure
Pause direct response -> Human review -> Disclosure log
Financial difficulty signal
Escalate hardship -> Specialist review -> Support note
Unsupported complaint closure
Block closure -> Complaint handler -> Investigation evidence
Sensitive compensation wording
Require approval -> Supervisor -> Approved wording
Missing investigation evidence
Hold action -> Case owner -> Evidence gap flag